Kingsbury v. Villeneuve

475 A.2d 241, 144 Vt. 648, 1984 Vt. LEXIS 467
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided March 19, 1984·No. No. 82-326·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Where a contract

is governed by the Statute of Frauds, in this case 12.. V.S.A. § 181(5), “any changes made are subjected to the same requirements of form as the original provisions.” Evarts v. Forte, 135 Vt. 306, 311, 376 A.2d 766, 769 (1977). Defendants’ oral modification of the written contract is therefore unenforceable, and the judgment for plaintiffs is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kingsbury v. Villeneuve, 475 A.2d 241, 144 Vt. 648, 1984 Vt. LEXIS 467 (Vt. 1984).

475 A.2d 241 (Kingsbury v. Villeneuve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prue v. Royer, Sr., and Department of Liquor Control
2013 VT 12 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2013)