Kingsbury v. United States

254 F.2d 959
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 1958
DocketNo. 13335
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 F.2d 959 (Kingsbury v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kingsbury v. United States, 254 F.2d 959 (6th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a district court judgment for the defendant in an action for damages (arising out of a collision between automobiles), brought, under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq., has been heard and duly considered on the oral arguments and briefs of contending attorneys and on the record in the case;

And it appearing that the fact findings of the district court are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, that the conclusions of law of the United States District Judge were correctly reached, and that the order dismissing the complaint was therefore properly entered;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenneth Kingsbury v. United States
254 F.2d 959 (Sixth Circuit, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 F.2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingsbury-v-united-states-ca6-1958.