King's Road
This text of 1 U.S. 11 (King's Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On confirmation of a road by the justices of Chester county, the record was brought up by certiorari; and it was moved to reverse the judgment of confirmation, because the justices below, had refused to grant a review', though petitioned thereto, by a person who complained he was aggrieved by the road running through his improved ground. On argument, the Court reversed the judgment for that reason, alleging that a review, though not taken notice of in the act of assembly, had always been granted, and was now become a matter of right.
In tho cases of the Strasburg road (2 Yeates 53), and the Berlin road (3 Id. 263), it was also held, that a review is a matter of right for parties interested; and now, by the act of 1802, § 22 (3 Sm. L. 521), the quarter sessions are authorized and required to grant a review in all cases. A second review may be granted by the sessions (2 Binn. 250), but it is discretionary with them (2 Yeates 53). And see 1 Bro. 210 3 S. & R. 236.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 U.S. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kings-road-pa-1764.