Kings Park Yacht Club, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kings Park Yacht Club, Inc. v. State

267 A.D.2d 356, 699 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 356 (Kings Park Yacht Club, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kings Park Yacht Club, Inc. v. State, 267 A.D.2d 356, 699 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to quiet title to a parcel of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated December 14, 1998, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order dated September 25, 1998, granting the plaintiffs motion to compel the defendant to supply water to the plaintiff without requiring that the plaintiff post signs stating that the water was not potable.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly refused to require posting of the requested notices (see, CPLR 2211). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to quiet title to a parcel of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated December 14, 1998, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order dated September 25, 1998, granting the plaintiffs motion to compel the defendant to supply water to the plaintiff without requiring that the plaintiff post signs stating that the water was not potable.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly refused to require posting of the requested notices (see, CPLR 2211). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 356, 699 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kings-park-yacht-club-inc-v-state-nyappdiv-1999.