King's Executors v. Bryant's Executors
3 N.C. 394
Opinions
Let this point be reserved, and let the proof proposed be now made as plaintiff's counsel propose to make it. *Page 343
This was done; and the defendant then proved that the obligor was so drunk at the time he could not stand, and did not know what he was about. But it was insisted that drunkenness alone is no objection; the law requires the party to have been drawn in to drink, and then imposed upon. 3 P. W., 130.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King's Executors v. Bryant's Executors, 3 N.C. 394 (N.C. Ct. App. 1806).
3 N.C. 394 (King's Executors v. Bryant's Executors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perry v. . Fleming
4 N.C. 344 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1816)
Logan v. . Simmons
18 N.C. 13 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1834)
Cameron v. . Power Co.
50 S.E. 695 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)