Kings County Trust Co. v. Giovinco
This text of 194 N.E. 60 (Kings County Trust Co. v. Giovinco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The payment of interest in advance, in the circumstances as found by the trial court and sustained by the weight of evidence, rebuts the presumption (New York Life Ins. Co. v. Casey, 178 N. Y. 381) that such payment indicates an extension of time so as to discharge a surety.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 N.E. 60, 266 N.Y. 137, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kings-county-trust-co-v-giovinco-ny-1934.