Kings County Properties Inc. v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kings County Properties Inc. v. Abrams

2 A.D.2d 710, 153 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 710 (Kings County Properties Inc. v. Abrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kings County Properties Inc. v. Abrams, 2 A.D.2d 710, 153 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator, which denies rent increases under subdivision 5 of section 33 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations on the ground that appellant, the landlord, is not maintaining essential services (painting), the appeal is from an order dismissing the proceeding. Appellant contends that painting was not included as part of the tenancies on March 1, 1943; that a prior order of the local rent office determined that painting is not part of the essential services and that such order established the law of the case, and that as to those apartments in which the tenants have furnished wallpaper no period of time is provided within which the tenants should remove the paper and prepare the walls for painting. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present ■—Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator, which denies rent increases under subdivision 5 of section 33 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations on the ground that appellant, the landlord, is not maintaining essential services (painting), the appeal is from an order dismissing the proceeding. Appellant contends that painting was not included as part of the tenancies on March 1, 1943; that a prior order of the local rent office determined that painting is not part of the essential services and that such order established the law of the case, and that as to those apartments in which the tenants have furnished wallpaper no period of time is provided within which the tenants should remove the paper and prepare the walls for painting. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present ■—Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 710, 153 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kings-county-properties-inc-v-abrams-nyappdiv-1956.