Kings County Investors Corp. v. Schmidt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kings County Investors Corp. v. Schmidt

248 A.D. 824, 290 N.Y.S. 752, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7505

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1936·Published

Opinion

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts involving the sufficiency of affidavits upon which an order directing service of a summons by publication was based. Judgment unanimously directed for the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the contract, with costs. In our opinion, the affidavits were sufficient to confer jurisdiction. Present—• Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Davis, JJ.; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts involving the sufficiency of affidavits upon which an order directing service of a summons by publication was based. Judgment unanimously directed for the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the contract, with costs. In our opinion, the affidavits were sufficient to confer jurisdiction. Present—• Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Davis, JJ.; Carswell, J., not voting.

Kings County Investors Corp. v. Schmidt, 248 A.D. 824, 290 N.Y.S. 752, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 824 (Kings County Investors Corp. v. Schmidt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.