Kings Bay Houses, Section Two, Inc. v. Malkis

50 A.D.2d 860, 377 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12159
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In an action inter alia to restrain defendants from harboring a dog within their apartment, defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 17, 1975, as granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements (see, e.g., Brigham Park Co-op. Apts. Section No. 2 v Krauss, 28 AD2d 846, affd 21 NY2d 941; East Riv. Housing Corp. v Matonis, 34 AD2d 937, affd 27 NY2d 931; Hilltop Vil. Co-op No. 4 v Goldstein, 43 Misc 2d 657, affd 23 AD2d 722). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kings Bay Houses, Section Two, Inc. v. Malkis, 50 A.D.2d 860, 377 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 860 (Kings Bay Houses, Section Two, Inc. v. Malkis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kingsbay Housing Co. v. Hoffman
61 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)