King's Alley Co. v. Diamond Parking, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

King's Alley Co. v. Diamond Parking, Inc.

546 P.2d 1, 56 Haw. 596

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 20, 1976

DocketNO. 5666

StatusPublished

This text of 546 P.2d 1 (King's Alley Co. v. Diamond Parking, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King's Alley Co. v. Diamond Parking, Inc., 546 P.2d 1, 56 Haw. 596 (haw 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the defendant and a cross appeal by the plaintiff.

In an action to collect arrearages in rental payment instituted by the plaintiff, the trial court gave judgment to the plaintiff in a lesser amount than claimed by the plaintiff.

Upon hearing the oral arguments and reading the briefs of both parties, and having reviewed the record herein, we are of the opinion that the errors alleged by both plaintiff and defendant do not merit a reversal of the judgment below.

However, this per curiam opinion is without prejudice to defendant’s alleged claim for relief under HRS § 480-2.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI