Kingry v. State

129 So. 349, 100 Fla. 163
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 9, 1930·Published

Opinion

*164 Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted' to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Wi-iiteield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kingry v. State, 129 So. 349, 100 Fla. 163 (Fla. 1930).

129 So. 349 (Kingry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.