Kingham & Co. v. Weddell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Kingham & Co. v. Weddell

65 S.E. 1101, 151 N.C. 151, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 219

DecidedSeptember 22, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.E. 1101 (Kingham & Co. v. Weddell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kingham & Co. v. Weddell, 65 S.E. 1101, 151 N.C. 151, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 219 (N.C. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The Court has carefully considered the record and the exceptions noted, and is of opinion that the results of the trial should not be disturbed.

There were various breaches of duty alleged against the defendant administrator, but on issues submitted each and every one of these alleged defaults have been decided by the jury in defendants’ favor, and, as stated, we find no reversible error in the trial or the disposition made of fhe case.

The judgment for the defendant is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The Court has carefully considered the record and the exceptions noted, and is of opinion that the results of the trial should not be disturbed.

There were various breaches of duty alleged against the defendant administrator, but on issues submitted each and every one of these alleged defaults have been decided by the jury in defendants’ favor, and, as stated, we find no reversible error in the trial or the disposition made of fhe case.

The judgment for the defendant is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.E. 1101, 151 N.C. 151, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingham-co-v-weddell-nc-1909.