Kingery v. State

158 So. 768, 26 Ala. App. 283, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 20
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 15, 1935
Docket4 Div. 62.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 So. 768 (Kingery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kingery v. State, 158 So. 768, 26 Ala. App. 283, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 20 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was charged under the name of Corbitt Kingery. I-Ie duly filed a “plea of misnomer,” setting forth that his true name was Corbert Kingry; and that he had never been known nor called by the name under which he was charged.

If we are to he consistent, it would seem that we must hold, as we do, that sustaining the state’s demurrer to appellant’s said plea was error. See Campbell v. State, 18 Ala. App. 219, 90 So. 43.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sexton v. State
180 So. 729 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 768, 26 Ala. App. 283, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingery-v-state-alactapp-1935.