King-Williams Realty & Mortgage, Inc. v. State Farm Life Insurance
This text of 236 S.E.2d 695 (King-Williams Realty & Mortgage, Inc. v. State Farm Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
King-Williams Realty & Mortgage, Inc., appellant, brought suit against State Farm Life Insurance Co. to recover a real estate broker’s commission allegedly earned when State Farm sold an apartment complex it owned. State Farm’s pre-trial motion for a summary judgment was denied but after King-Williams’ first witness testified, State Farm moved for judgment in its favor which was granted in the form of a directed verdict. State Farm’s motion, although treated by the court as a motion for directed verdict, was tantamount to a renewed motion for summary judgment. No material issues of fact remained after the president of King-Williams testified that his firm never had any direct contact with the party who bought the apartment complex. It conclusively appearing that King-Williams was not the procuring cause of the sale, a summary judgment in State Farm’s behalf was then proper. Code § 4-213; Parrish v. Ragsdale Realty Co., 135 Ga. App. 491 (218 SE2d 164).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 S.E.2d 695, 142 Ga. App. 620, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-williams-realty-mortgage-inc-v-state-farm-life-insurance-gactapp-1977.