King v. Yeager

198 A.2d 443, 41 N.J. 595, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 268
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 17, 1964
StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.2d 443 (King v. Yeager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Yeager, 198 A.2d 443, 41 N.J. 595, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 268 (N.J. 1964).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the refusal of the Hudson County Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus and adjudicate the case on its merits.

The issues now raised are identical with the issues heretofore raised and adjudicated on appeal to this court. State v. King, 37 N. J. 285 (1962). The posing of these questions in pseudo-constitutional guise adds nothing new for consideration.

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man—7.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 A.2d 443, 41 N.J. 595, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-yeager-nj-1964.