King v. Wright

77 Ga. 581
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 21, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Jackson, Chief Justice.

This case is suit for a mare in foal, and the recovery is of the mare and colt after birth. The suit was brought on the ground that the jack traded for the mare with foal was palmed off on the plaintiff as one that was good for mares, by false representations; there was evidence enough to sustain the verdict, and the judge presiding approving the verdict, it must stand. If the declaration did not sufficiently describe the colt as sued for, it was amendable and [582] the justice of the case makes the recovery of both mare and colt proper. It is therefore affirmed, because the mare and her foal both belonged to plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Wright, 77 Ga. 581 (Ga. 1886).

77 Ga. 581 (King v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Small v. Wilson
93 S.E. 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Venable v. Burton
45 S.E. 29 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)