King v. . Worsley

3 N.C. 366
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1805·Published

Opinion

The advancement must be estimated according to the value when advanced.

NOTE. — See Stallings v. Stallings, 16 N.C. 298.

Cited: Lamb v. Carroll, 28 N.C. 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. . Worsley, 3 N.C. 366 (N.C. Ct. App. 1805).

3 N.C. 366 (King v. . Worsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Ledford
28 N.C. 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1845)
Stallings v. . Stallings
16 N.C. 298 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1829)