King v. Wooldridge
78 Miss. 179
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
There is no assignment of the debt by any valid act of the corporation.shown. The corporation was plainly insolvent, not a going concern,-nor one with any prospect of going on at any time in the future. It could not in such condition prefer its director, secretary and treasurer. Love M'f'g. Co. v. Queen City M'f'g. Co., 74 Miss., 290.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Wooldridge, 78 Miss. 179 (Mich. 1900).
78 Miss. 179 (King v. Wooldridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cooper v. Mississippi Land Company
220 So. 2d 302 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1969)
Wood v. Gulf States Capital Corporation
217 So. 2d 257 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1968)
Smith v. Mississippi Livestock Producers Ass'n
188 So. 2d 758 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1966)
Stuart v. Larson
298 F. 223 (Eighth Circuit, 1924)
City National Bank v. Goshen Woolen Mills Co.
69 N.E. 206 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1903)
Nappanee Canning Co. v. Reid, Murdoch & Co.
64 N.E. 870 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)