King v. Wooldridge

Mississippi Supreme Court

King v. Wooldridge

78 Miss. 179

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 78 Miss. 179 (King v. Wooldridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Wooldridge, 78 Miss. 179 (Mich. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no assignment of the debt by any valid act of the corporation.shown. The corporation was plainly insolvent, not a going concern,-nor one with any prospect of going on at any time in the future. It could not in such condition prefer its director, secretary and treasurer. Love M'f'g. Co. v. Queen City M'f'g. Co., 74 Miss., 290.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitfield, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no assignment of the debt by any valid act of the corporation.shown. The corporation was plainly insolvent, not a going concern,-nor one with any prospect of going on at any time in the future. It could not in such condition prefer its director, secretary and treasurer. Love M'f'g. Co. v. Queen City M'f'g. Co., 74 Miss., 290.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 Miss. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-wooldridge-miss-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack