King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.
693 N.W.2d 876, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 158, 2005 WL 729499
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc., 693 N.W.2d 876, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 158, 2005 WL 729499 (Mich. 2005).
693 N.W.2d 876 (King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)