King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.

693 N.W.2d 876, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 158, 2005 WL 729499
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 29, 2005
DocketNo. A04-2071
StatusPublished

This text of 693 N.W.2d 876 (King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Woodsman Midwest, Inc., 693 N.W.2d 876, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 158, 2005 WL 729499 (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 N.W.2d 876, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 158, 2005 WL 729499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-woodsman-midwest-inc-minn-2005.