King v. Winchell
This text of 248 A.D. 809 (King v. Winchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the evidence was sufficient to go to the jury on the question of defamation. (The judgment is for defendant in a slander action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-winchell-nyappdiv-1936.