King v. Winchell
248 A.D. 809
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the evidence was sufficient to go to the jury on the question of defamation. (The judgment is for defendant in a slander action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Winchell, 248 A.D. 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 809 (King v. Winchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gautier v. Pro-Football, Inc.
278 A.D. 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Locke v. Gibbons
164 Misc. 877 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)