King v. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co.
This text of 172 So. 693 (King v. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause coming on for consideration of plaintiff in error’s motion to tax and allow costs in this case purusant to the judgment of reversal heretofore entered May 14, 1936 (King v. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co., 124 Fla. 272, 168 Sou. Rep. 858), and it appearing that the motion to tax costs was filed at the term at which the case was finally disposed of, it is thereupon ordered that the Clerk do tax the costs herein as follows:
Docket fee Supreme Court______________$12.00
Cost of issuance and recording writ of error and incidental papers in Circuit Court paid by plaintiff in error to Circuit Court Clerk to perfect appeal record----------------- 5.93
Costs paid by plaintiff in error purusant to Section 4618 C. G. L., 2908 R. G. S., to procure issuance of writ of error____________34.55
Cost of preparing one original and one copy of transcript of record, 46000 words______98.30
Cost of Clerk’s verification of transcript — 16.70
All of which let be certified'as part of the mandate in this cause. See: Bay View Estates Corp. v. Southerland, 126 Fla. 239, 170 Sou. Rep. 732.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 So. 693, 127 Fla. 109, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-weis-patterson-lumber-co-fla-1937.