Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/King v. Village of Tully

King v. Village of Tully

257 A.D. 1035, 14 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8974
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1939·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We think the verdict directed by the court finds support in the evidence and is not against its weight and there being no errors of law on the trial the judgment should be affirmed. (Danaher v. City of Brooklyn, 119 N. Y. 241, 254, 255; Tagg v. City of Lockport, 228 App. Div. 319, 320; affd., 254 N. Y. 582; Gubasko v. City of New York, 12 Daly, 183; affd., 1 N. Y. Supp. 215, 217; Murphy v. City of Lockport, 257 App. Div. 920; Lahart v. City of New York, 246 N. Y. 643.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Village of Tully, 257 A.D. 1035, 14 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

257 A.D. 1035 (King v. Village of Tully) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danaher v. . City of Brooklyn
23 N.E. 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
La Hart v. City of New York
159 N.E. 684 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Tagg v. City of Lockport
173 N.E. 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Tagg v. City of Lockport
228 A.D. 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Murphy v. City of Lockport
257 A.D. 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Gubasko v. City of New York
1 N.Y.S. 215 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1888)
Gubasko v. Mayor of New York
12 Daly 183 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1883)