King v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1060, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3415
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 8, 1969
DocketNo. P69/7; protests 59/9043 and 59/9042 (Laredo)
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1060 (King v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1060, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3415 (cusc 1969).

Opinion

Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of so-called dedicated moldings, produced by a molding machine, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Bailey-Mora Company, Inc., et al. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey-Mora Co. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 99 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Cust. Ct. 1060, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-united-states-cusc-1969.