Home/U.S. Customs Court/King v. United States

King v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 351, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 130
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 26, 1953
DocketNo. 57100; protests 186174-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Cust. Ct. 351 (King v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 351, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 130 (cusc 1953).

Opinion

[352]*352Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed (Lotus corniculatus) similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 163 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Cust. Ct. 351, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-united-states-cusc-1953.