King v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 379, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 370
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 Cust. Ct. 33
United States Customs Court·Decided February 10, 1948·No. No. 7535; Entry Nos. 713813; 740063·Published

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Acf of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 379, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 370 (cusc 1948).

20 Cust. Ct. 379 (King v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.