King v. Thorpe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

King v. Thorpe

1921 OK 268, 216 P. 1054, 90 Okla. 194, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 446

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 5, 1921

Docket10969

StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK 268 (King v. Thorpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Thorpe, 1921 OK 268, 216 P. 1054, 90 Okla. 194, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 446 (Okla. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

NI OH OX/S ON, J.

In this case the parties have filed a stipulation by which it is agreed that the same judgment shall be rendered in this court as is rendered in the case of Charles Beindorf, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pearl Thorpe et al., Defendants in Error, No. 11-935 (decided June 28, 1921), and as the judgment of the' lower court in that cause has been reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial and have an accounting as to the rental value of the premises, and ascertain the amount due the defendants, crediting the plaintiff with the reasonable rental value of the premises during the time same were occupied by Dayton and his heirs, and render jugdment decreeing the deed to be a mortgage and permit the plaintiff to pay the amount of the indebtedness found to be due and make redemption of the property, the judgment decreeing the deed to be a mort-remanded with like directions.

PITOHFORD, Y. O. J., and McNEILL, MILDER, and ELTING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NI OH OX/S ON, J.

In this case the parties have filed a stipulation by which it is agreed that the same judgment shall be rendered in this court as is rendered in the case of Charles Beindorf, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pearl Thorpe et al., Defendants in Error, No. 11-935 (decided June 28, 1921), and as the judgment of the' lower court in that cause has been reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial and have an accounting as to the rental value of the premises, and ascertain the amount due the defendants, crediting the plaintiff with the reasonable rental value of the premises during the time same were occupied by Dayton and his heirs, and render jugdment decreeing the deed to be a mortgage and permit the plaintiff to pay the amount of the indebtedness found to be due and make redemption of the property, the judgment decreeing the deed to be a mort-remanded with like directions.

PITOHFORD, Y. O. J., and McNEILL, MILDER, and ELTING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK 268, 216 P. 1054, 90 Okla. 194, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-thorpe-okla-1921.