King v. Tarlton
2 Md. 473
This text of 2 Md. 473 (King v. Tarlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. Tarlton, 2 Md. 473 (Va. Super. Ct. 1790).
Opinion
were of opinion that the said Cecil was a com» ietent witness, and directed him to he sworn.
The plaintiff excepted to this opinion.
Yerdipt and judgment thereon for the defendants.
The plaintiff appealed to the General Court, which Court affirmed the judgment of the County Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Md. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-tarlton-vagensess-1790.