Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/King v. Syracuse, L. S. & N. R.

King v. Syracuse, L. S. & N. R.

141 N.Y.S. 1127, 157 A.D. 902, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6193
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 21, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 141 N.Y.S. 1127 (King v. Syracuse, L. S. & N. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Syracuse, L. S. & N. R., 141 N.Y.S. 1127, 157 A.D. 902, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of Oswego County Court (131 N. Y. Supp. 878), and judgment and order of City Court of Fulton, reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts to the appellant. Held, that the proof shows that the overcharge was made through inadvertr ence and mistake not amounting to gross negligence, and defendant’s motion for a nonsuit should have been granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Syracuse, Lake Shore & Northern Railroad
131 N.Y.S. 878 (New York County Courts, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 N.Y.S. 1127, 157 A.D. 902, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-syracuse-l-s-n-r-nyappdiv-1913.