King v. State

31 S.W.2d 1116, 116 Tex. Crim. 12, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 634
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 Tex. Crim. 130
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 18, 1930·No. No. 13514.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for aggravated assault; punishment, one month in the county jail, and a fine of $50.00.

*13 Appellant was on trial for assault with intent to murder, and the jury being of opinion that the facts did not justify the higher grade of offense, found him guilty of aggravated assault. The facts show, from the State’s standpoint, that appellant was standing by a road with a shot gun in his hand when Mr. Hare passed by with his wife and child in a car. After they had passed appellant discharged his gun and both Mrs. Hare and the child were struck by the shot. Appellant claimed he was shooting at a bird. The charge of the court submitted the issues of law in a manner so satisfactory to appellant that he took no exception thereto. We think the facts sufficient to justify the verdict and judgment.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

A firmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 31 S.W.2d 1116, 116 Tex. Crim. 12, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 634 (Tex. 1930).

31 S.W.2d 1116 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.