King v. State
129 S.W. 626, 59 Tex. Crim. 511, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 357
Opinions
This conviction was for violation of the local option law.
The bills of exception and statement of facts are not approved by the trial judge, and, therefore, can not be considered. There are no questions that can be considered or revised without the statement of facts and bills of exception. As the record is presented the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
ON REHEARING.
June 8, 1910.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 129 S.W. 626, 59 Tex. Crim. 511, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 357 (Tex. 1910).
129 S.W. 626 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lightfoot v. State
95 S.W.2d 436 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)