King v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

King v. State

534 S.W.3d 926

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 2017·No. WD 79951·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Tony King appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree arson, and felony abuse of a child. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Tony King appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree arson, and felony abuse of a child. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

King v. State, 534 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

534 S.W.3d 926 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.