King v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

King v. State

534 S.W.3d 926

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 19, 2017

DocketWD 79951

StatusPublished

This text of 534 S.W.3d 926 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 534 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Tony King appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree arson, and felony abuse of a child. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Tony King appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree arson, and felony abuse of a child. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 S.W.3d 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-moctapp-2017.