King v. State

209 A.2d 246, 238 Md. 622, 1965 Md. LEXIS 690
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided April 28, 1965·No. No. 282·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant King was convicted of the crime of arson by Judge Harlan and sentenced to five years in the Maryland Penitentiary. The lawyer who had been privately employed by appellant to represent him at the trial was appointed to represent him as an indigent on appeal.

Appellant’s brief reveals that King was told that in his lawyer’s best professional judgment no appeal was warranted, either on the law or the facts. We find nothing in the record to indicate that counsel was wrong.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 209 A.2d 246, 238 Md. 622, 1965 Md. LEXIS 690 (Md. 1965).

209 A.2d 246 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
251 A.2d 628 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1969)