King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

King v. State

153 S.E. 79, 41 Ga. App. 376, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 606

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1930

Docket20380

StatusPublished

This text of 153 S.E. 79 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 153 S.E. 79, 41 Ga. App. 376, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 606 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The accused was charged with simple larceny, and when tried a verdict of guilty was returned. The evidence did not show, as alleged in the accusation, that the defendant wrongfully and fraudulently took and carried away with intent to steal the same, certain cottonseed, the property of L. O. Brown; and the trial court erred in not granting a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The accused was charged with simple larceny, and when tried a verdict of guilty was returned. The evidence did not show, as alleged in the accusation, that the defendant wrongfully and fraudulently took and carried away with intent to steal the same, certain cottonseed, the property of L. O. Brown; and the trial court erred in not granting a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 S.E. 79, 41 Ga. App. 376, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-gactapp-1930.