King v. State
This text of 493 S.E.2d 189 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the appellant, Etheridge King, an inmate, failed to use a form promulgated by the Administrative Office of the Courts in preparing his complaint,1 and because the clerk of superior court, contrary to the requirements of OCGA § 9-10-14 (b), accepted King’s complaint for filing even though King did not use the proper form, we conclude that the trial court did not err in dismissing King’s action without prejudice.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
493 S.E.2d 189, 268 Ga. 384, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 3407, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-ga-1997.