Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/King v. State

King v. State

50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 153, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 134
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 2, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 S.E. 64 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. State, 50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 153, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 134 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Lamar, J.

This court will not interfere with the order of the judge of the superior court refusing to sanction a writ of certiorari from a judgment of conviction in a county court, where the record fails to show that the petitioner filed the affidavit required by the Penal Code, §765.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Theodore Titus, for plaintiff in error. W. E. Thomas, solicitor-general, and Boscoe Luke, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grant v. State
55 S.E. 471 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Blassingame v. State
54 S.E. 180 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Bennett v. State
53 S.E. 815 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 153, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-ga-1905.