King v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

King v. State

50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 153, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 134

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 2, 1905·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lamar, J.

This court will not interfere with the order of the judge of the superior court refusing to sanction a writ of certiorari from a judgment of conviction in a county court, where the record fails to show that the petitioner filed the affidavit required by the Penal Code, §765.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Theodore Titus, for plaintiff in error. W. E. Thomas, solicitor-general, and Boscoe Luke, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamar, J.

This court will not interfere with the order of the judge of the superior court refusing to sanction a writ of certiorari from a judgment of conviction in a county court, where the record fails to show that the petitioner filed the affidavit required by the Penal Code, §765.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Theodore Titus, for plaintiff in error. W. E. Thomas, solicitor-general, and Boscoe Luke, contra.

King v. State, 50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 153, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 134 (Ga. 1905).

Pincite

50 S.E. 64 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related