King v. State
This text of 46 S.E. 633 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
King was tried and convicted, in Madison county, for the offense of pointing a pistol at another. The only special ground of his motion for a new trial set up that Pittman, one of the jurors, was a resident of Jackson county at the time of the trial. Several affidavits were offered in support of the averment made in this ground. The State offered, by way of counter-showing, two affidavits of the juror, in which he averred distinctly and unequivocally that he resided in Madison county at the time the trial was had. Under these circumstances this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling this ground of the motion. The rule is similar to that followed by this court in cases where the verdict is sought to be set aside on account of the disqualification of a juror for any other reason. See Jones v. State, 117 Ga. 710 (4); Perry v. State, Id. 719 (2).
There was ample evidence to warrant the verdict, and the general grounds of the motion are therefore without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 S.E. 633, 119 Ga. 426, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-ga-1904.