King v. State

125 So. 3d 934, 2013 WL 2218007, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8134
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16637
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 2013·No. No. 4D12-3630·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. With respect to ground two, see State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla.1991) (holding it is not a double jeopardy violation for a defendant to be convicted of both sale and possession of the same quan-[935]*935turn of cocaine, after the effective date of section 775.021, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), as each offense contains an element the other does not).

GROSS, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 125 So. 3d 934, 2013 WL 2218007, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8134 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

125 So. 3d 934 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McCloud
577 So. 2d 939 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)