King v. State

123 So. 3d 661, 2013 WL 5628672, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16400
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16637
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 2013·No. No. 4D13-176·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the denial of appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The sentencing documents reflect that the court imposed thirty-year sentences for unarmed robbery counts, which exceed the fifteen-year statutory maximum for a second degree felony. The sentencing order does not designate appellant as a habitual offender. The state concedes that the sentences require correction, as they exceed that statutory maximum. We remand for the trial court to correct these sentences for strong arm robbery in Case Nos. 01-4344, 01-3524, 01-3092, and 01-3089.

Reversed and remanded to correct sentence.

WARNER, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 123 So. 3d 661, 2013 WL 5628672, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16400 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

123 So. 3d 661 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.