Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/King v. State

King v. State

3 So. 3d 1270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3614, 2009 WL 559951
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 939 So. 2d 1196 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 2009·No. 5D08-4232·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order summarily denying King’s Rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail time credit is affirmed without prejudice to King’s right to file a facially sufficient Rule 3.800(a) motion. See Hinlcel v. State, 937 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA2006).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 3 So. 3d 1270, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3614, 2009 WL 559951 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

3 So. 3d 1270 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hinkel v. State
937 So. 2d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)