Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/King v. State

King v. State

742 So. 2d 307, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 1999 WL 360540
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 696 So. 2d 860 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1999·No. No. 98-3670·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order below, which construed appellant’s letter to the court as a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and then dismissed it. This affirmance is, however, without prejudice to appellant’s filing a motion that conforms with the requirements of that rule.

MINER, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 742 So. 2d 307, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5970, 1999 WL 360540 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

742 So. 2d 307 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.