King v. State
575 So. 2d 672, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 487, 1991 WL 7095
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 557 So. 2d 899 →
Opinion
We affirm the sentencing of the appellant as a habitual offender, and further affirm on the issue wherein the appellant attacks the constitutionality of section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). See Arnold v. State, 566 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990); Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2nd DCA), dismissed, 564 So.2d 488 (Fla.1990); King v. State, 557 So.2d 899 (Fla. 5th [673]*673DCA), rev. denied, 564 So.2d 1086 (Fla.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 575 So. 2d 672, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 487, 1991 WL 7095 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
575 So. 2d 672 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
King v. State
557 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Arnold v. State
566 So. 2d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Roberts v. State
559 So. 2d 289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)