King v. State

820 So. 2d 941, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 538, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1151, 2002 WL 1065970
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 30, 2002·No. No. SC01-1883·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted for review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in King v. State, 790 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which certified conflict with Winter v. State, 781 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), and certified the following question for review:

DOES THE OFFICE OF THE STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR HAVE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE A BURGLARY IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH IT WAS COMMITTED IF IT IS ALLEGED THAT THE BURGLARY WAS A PART OF A BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN MUL-TI-CIRCUIT CRIMES?

Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this .review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 820 So. 2d 941, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 538, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1151, 2002 WL 1065970 (Fla. 2002).

820 So. 2d 941 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
102 So. 3d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)