King v. State

520 So. 2d 582, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 172, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 285, 1988 WL 18698
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 1988
DocketNo. 71306
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 520 So. 2d 582 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. State, 520 So. 2d 582, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 172, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 285, 1988 WL 18698 (Fla. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review King v. State, 511 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), in which the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance:

IS THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE STILL AN EFFECTIVE BASIS ON WHICH TO EXCEED THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM AS LONG AS THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATION?

Id. at 1132. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The district court’s decision is consistent with our decision in Winters v. State, 522 So.2d 816 (Fla.1988), in which we recently answered this question in the affirmative. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forrest v. State
589 So. 2d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 So. 2d 582, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 172, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 285, 1988 WL 18698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-fla-1988.