King v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

King v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

601 So. 2d 1343, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8576, 1992 WL 175569

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 1992·No. No. 91-2042·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth King appeals a final order adjudicating her daughter, J.K., dependent. She asserts error in the admission of certain hearsay statements of two of J.K.’s older siblings pursuant to section 90.-803(23), Florida Statutes (1989). Assuming arguendo that there was error in the admission of the siblings’ statements, any error was harmless. The dependency petition asserted multiple grounds for the dependency adjudication. Leaving the siblings’ statements entirely aside, there was an abundance of substantial competent evidence to support the order under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth King appeals a final order adjudicating her daughter, J.K., dependent. She asserts error in the admission of certain hearsay statements of two of J.K.’s older siblings pursuant to section 90.-803(23), Florida Statutes (1989). Assuming arguendo that there was error in the admission of the siblings’ statements, any error was harmless. The dependency petition asserted multiple grounds for the dependency adjudication. Leaving the siblings’ statements entirely aside, there was an abundance of substantial competent evidence to support the order under review.

Affirmed.

King v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 601 So. 2d 1343, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8576, 1992 WL 175569 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

601 So. 2d 1343 (King v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related