King v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

King v. State

192 A.3d 555

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware

DecidedAugust 6, 2018

Docket338, 2018

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.3d 555 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 192 A.3d 555 (Del. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Leo E. Strine, Jr., Chief Justice

After careful consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the appellee's motion to affirm, and the record, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court order, dated June 11, 2018, denying the appellant's motion for a progress report. The Superior Court was not required to issue a progress report on the appellant's service of his twenty-four-year, non-suspended Level V sentence.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leo E. Strine, Jr., Chief Justice

After careful consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the appellee's motion to affirm, and the record, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court order, dated June 11, 2018, denying the appellant's motion for a progress report. The Superior Court was not required to issue a progress report on the appellant's service of his twenty-four-year, non-suspended Level V sentence.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.3d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-del-2018.