King v. State

583 So. 2d 1371, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1166, 1991 WL 165061
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 574 So. 2d 921
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided June 28, 1991·No. 8 Div. 371·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Terry Drew King, was convicted of two counts of rape in the first degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. Since the evidence only showed that a single instance was involved, we remanded this case so that the trial court could vacate three of the appellant’s convictions and sentences, 574 So.2d 921. On return to remand, the trial court has fully complied with our directions by vacating three of the appellant’s convictions and enforcing the appellant’s conviction of rape in the first degree. The trial court has further vacated three of the sentences imposed on the appellant and has resentenced him to life imprisonment. Thus, the appellant’s conviction and sentence is due to be affirmed.

OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 583 So. 2d 1371, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1166, 1991 WL 165061 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

583 So. 2d 1371 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
574 So. 2d 921 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)