King v. State

460 So. 2d 864, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5901
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 518 So. 2d 880
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided November 13, 1984·No. 1 Div. 608·Published

Opinion

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

The judgment in this case was reversed and the cause remanded because the trial [865]*865judge failed to prepare a written statement as to the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking the appellant’s probation. King v. State, 451 So.2d 367 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984).

In response to the order of reversal and remand, the trial judge prepared a written order of his findings and reasons in compliance with Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975). Subsequently, this Court set aside its order of reversal and restored the cause to the docket.

The judgment of the circuit court revoking appellant’s probation is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 460 So. 2d 864, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5901 (Ala. Ct. App. 1984).

460 So. 2d 864 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armstrong v. State
312 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
King v. State
451 So. 2d 367 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)