King v. State

255 So. 2d 57, 47 Ala. App. 739, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 518
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 45 Ala. App. 348
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided November 23, 1971·No. 8 Div. 176·Published

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Assault with intent to rob: sentence, five years in the penitentiary.

I

The original indictment was set aside because of what the Supreme Court in State ex rel. Gregg v. Maples, 286 Ala. 274, 239 So.2d 198, characterized as a species of “fraud in law.” The effect of that opinion was to set aside a method of making up the jury roll of Madison County—seemingly between the dates of January 1 and sometime after September 3, 1970 (the date of the Supreme Court’s opinion).

No exception was taken to the second indictment.

II

We have carefully considered the entire record as required by Code 1940, T. IS, § 389 and conclude that reversible error is not made to appear. Accordingly, the judgment below is due to be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. State, 255 So. 2d 57, 47 Ala. App. 739, 1971 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 518 (Ala. Ct. App. 1971).

255 So. 2d 57 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex. Rel. Gregg v. Maples
239 So. 2d 198 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1970)