King v. Southwick
66 How. Pr. 282
This text of 66 How. Pr. 282 (King v. Southwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. Southwick, 66 How. Pr. 282 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).
Opinion
J. F. Daly, J.
— The motion to vacate an attachment must be granted. The whole cause of action (which is for conspiracy and fraud) is stated on information and belief, and the sources of information are not given. Such a verification of the cause of action is proper in a pleading, but is not proper in an affidavit upon an application to obtain an attachment.
Ten dollars costs to defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 How. Pr. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-southwick-nyctcompl-1884.