King v. Southern Railway Co.

63 S.E. 339, 131 Ga. 799, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 12
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. Southern Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 L.R.A.N.S. 544
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The evidence supported the verdict. The trial judge did not commit error for any reason assigned, either in ruling upon the admissibility of evidence, or in charging the jury, sufficient, to require the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Southern Railway Co., 63 S.E. 339, 131 Ga. 799, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 12 (Ga. 1909).

63 S.E. 339 (King v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.